aefenglommung (aefenglommung) wrote,

The beatings will continue until morale improves!

I got a letter from our Conference Commissar of Healthy Relationships today. Somebody really needs to teach this lady how to write a letter. It starts out all friendly and collegial: "On behalf of Bishop ___, the Cabinet . . . and the Board of Ordained Ministry, I would like to invite you [my italics] to participate in" a couple of workshops on Diversity Training and Professional Boundaries. Having thus "invited me," she goes on to say, "These two (2) training events are mandatory for all appointed pastors . . ." [emphasis in the original]. So, we descend from collegiality to the iron fist before we've even gotten to the second paragraph, which is pretty quick even for a Conference apparatchik.

The letter ends by saying, "Any pastor not attending in their scheduled year is placing their appointment at risk." Now, I'm an Elder in Full Connection, and though the bishop can move me to Outer Podunk UMC at his pleasure, I don't think anybody sending this letter has the power to remove me from the clergy, which is the only thing that would prevent me from receiving an appointment. But let that go. We aren't discussing this among colleagues, we're issuing orders.

This has become the default mode in The UMC these days. Back in the old days, the courtesy would have extended throughout the letter, and even in person the Bishop, one's Superintendent, or the Board of Ordained Ministry would never use such language; nevertheless, no one would have dreamed of blowing off the invitation to participate. And I'm not saying that we shouldn't have such events, or that I'm unwilling to attend them. But I don't like being ordered about by some jumped-up bureaucrat with exactly the same standing under the Discipline that I have. Especially not after the sixth or seventh time I get such a letter.

To add injury to insult, one of these courses costs thirty bucks and the other, fifteen. My feeling is that if they're going to demand I attend these things they ought to bloody well pay for them. I should be able to reserve my money for things I have a choice to attend.

  • Point of view in LOTR

    One of the achievements of The Lord of the Rings is its complicated narrative architecture. Stories are interlaced and we follow, now this sub-plot,…

  • Arthur contra mundum

    The consensus opinion among Tolkien critics -- including those who greatly admire his work -- is that The Lord of the Rings is slow to get going,…

  • Not all ancient institutions are good

    The institutions of the Roman Republic have cast a long shadow over western government. Even our Founders paid close attention to the Roman model,…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.