aefenglommung (aefenglommung) wrote,
aefenglommung
aefenglommung

This makes me ill

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/12/11/peterson.wife.ap/index.html?iref=werecommend

I understand that there are times when it is appropriate for a member of the clergy to testify about what one knows. There are also times when confidentiality can and should be waived. But it seems that the Rev. Chatty Cathy here (whatever his name is) has just dumped the secrets of the confessional on Greta Van Sustern. I am disgusted.
Subscribe

  • Shibboleths

    I dislike shibboleths. Sometimes, they are used to define in-groups and sometimes they are used to define out-groups, but when a word or phrase is…

  • One potato, two potato

    Hasbro has announced that it will change the name of its Mr. Potato Head toy to simply, “Potato Head.” In de-gendering its toy, it hopes to appeal to…

  • Conscience and the practice of medicine

    I read a post online recently that said that those who refuse to offer medical care because of some personal belief of theirs have no business in…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 5 comments