?

Log in

No account? Create an account
The Daily Mustard
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]

Thursday, November 8th, 2012

Time Event
9:53a
Vote Me for Student Body President
One thing that we conservatives are coming to terms with is that we were rejected at the ballot box this week. Big time. It's been said that conservatism in the US is a three-legged stool. That is, there are three different kinds of conservatives. They all blame the others for their losses, but in fact each is necessary for conservatives to win. There are economic conservatives, social conservatives, and foreign policy conservatives. All were reasonably well represented in Romney's campaign. And a majority of voters rejected their arguments.

Economic conservatives pointed out the fiscal disaster heading straight for us, which Obama has made worse by quantum levels. The majority didn't care. Social conservatives talked about marriage and religious liberty. The majority turned them aside. Foreign policy conservatives pointed to the President's awful policy mistakes, and even his callous abandonment of a U.S. Ambassador to his death. The majority yawned. One possible conclusion is that we are no longer a center-right country, but now a center-left country. Certainly, that's the kind of country that Obama wants to make us. Is that now an accomplished fact? Can conservatives ever win again on the national level?

Well, we certainly won in the 2010 midterm elections, and I think we'll do well two years hence. Obama ran away from his record, and he's got nothing to offer that will fix the messes he's made or worsened. But then, how to explain such a defeat of a very good candidate running against a very bad incumbent? Was it all just about incumbency, or getting out the vote, or demographics?

At the end of my sophomore year in high school, I ran for Junior Class President. It was fun. I made some cool posters. I gave my campaign speech. And I lost. Big time. The cool kids with all the friends came out ahead in the student body elections, as always. Quirky, shy guys who lived in their heads need not have applied. And you can understand why. After all, what is there to run on? You can't promise anything. You have no real duties, other than organizing the prom, or, later, organizing class reunions. Student body elections aren't really about anything, other than popularity.

Looking at this election and reading my liberal friends' internet postings, I get the idea that that is all this campaign was about. The cool kids all banded together to elect their guy, because those other kids and their guy were just -- icky. Out of it. Not cool.

Sour grapes? But consider: while a majority of the electorate clearly favored Barack Obama, consistent polling has shown that clear majorities do not favor his signature achievements and principal stands. When asked what they think we need, Americans say we need to fix the debt and deficit problems, they say we don't want Obamacare, and so on. But when asked whom they want to be their leader, they choose the guy who made the mess (or made it catastrophically worse). Why? Because, you know -- he's cool.

This cultural liking for liberals, as such, is as much a fact to be dealt with as the public's desire for conservative policies. In the end, the country wants liberal politicians to do conservative things. Which is nuts. But there you are. If it all mattered no more than who got to be Junior Class President, it wouldn't bother me, but of course, it matters a lot. In the end, the decisions made in voting booths are not made on the basis of careful calculation, but in response to deeply held values. It's the culture, stupid.
2:09p
The Deerslayer
I told Deanne this morning that I think I need to buy a gun. I have three reasons.

First, our economic situation in retirement makes hunting to supply ourselves with food more than a hobby. I've never been a hunter, so this would be a big adjustment for me, but it's important to provide for my family, and I can learn.

Second, while not a huge deal, there is some protection value in having a firearm to hand, given that we will be living in the boonies. I am not seriously thinking we'll have widespread civil disorder in the near future, but it's always a possibility if the hard times continue. (Since the same weapon may not fit both uses, I might have to buy a second gun some time.)

Third, joining the National Society of Bitter Clingers would give me some emotional satisfaction. I've never thought gun ownership important to my sense of self, but perhaps in an increasingly hostile culture, it would be a way of flying my flag, and saying, "I caucus with those guys." I'm also not one of those who have obsessed about liberals trying to take away our guns, but I'm thinking that if I'm going to buy a weapon, I'd better get after it while it is still relatively easy to buy one.

In case you're wondering, Deanne enthusiastically agreed.

<< Previous Day 2012/11/08
[Calendar]
Next Day >>
About LiveJournal.com