aefenglommung (aefenglommung) wrote,
aefenglommung
aefenglommung

Okay, I'm done.

The moderator of the United Methodist Clergy group on Facebook just posted in a response to a flaming argument in that group,
The anti-gays need this forum so they can feel like they are winning the online world argument even as their beliefs fall away in the real world. It was the same with those who opposed women's ordination and the inclusion of black ministers. My only work is to speed up the process.
I find that extraordinarily offensive. And it made me realize, I certainly don't need this forum. So, I have terminated my membership in that group. I'm not posting this there, since that would just keep the ruckus going -- besides looking like I felt like I needed to express it in that group. I'm just done, with all of them, pro- or anti- as the case may be. At least 75% of all the comments I read on that group, on all sides, make me mad. I'm glad I didn't know any of them when I was coming into the clergy, because I either wouldn't have entered the calling at all, or at least wouldn't have chosen to associate with this bunch.

What an embarrassment we are, to be sure.
Subscribe

  • On standard English

    There have always been different varieties of English. The barbarians from across the North Sea who settled in Britannia in the 5th Century spoke…

  • On missions

    I just finished reading a major work on Anglo-Saxon religion before the conversion to Christianity. Only traces remain of the old heathenism; the…

  • What is an evangelical?

    This is a critique of a critique of a critique. I was reading an online piece by David Watson, a leader in the GMC and newly-named President of…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment