aefenglommung (aefenglommung) wrote,

The other side of the coin

Every decision involves counting the cost. Some things are not for sale at any price, but others are negotiable. In deciding to allow gay youth to be members of BSA (but not gay adults), BSA has made a calculated decision. There are things to be gained, but there are also things that will be lost.

A friend whom I took to Philmont as a youth, who is now a Lutheran pastor, has announced that he will be returning his Eagle badge. The loss of those who cannot be reconciled to BSA's action must be weighed against the gain of others who were or might be deterred from involvement in Scouting by BSA's long-held stance.

When our Council Executive Board debated their response to the proposed membership change, I voted for the proposal that has now been accepted. But BSA should not construe the support of so many of us beyond the narrow limits of what we were asked to consider.

I talked with a long-time Scouter I met up with downtown this morning. We have both known a few gay or bisexual Scouts over our years, and suspected others. Yet, we have never acted to have them removed. We have kept our lines of communication open and led them as best we could. The fact is, the only way a kid could really get thrown out of the program was by making himself obnoxious, by insisting that he-was-gay-and-what-are-you-gonna-do-about-it. Our acceptance of the membership change is merely an institutional recognition of that stance.

But what I also told my fellow Scouter was that the real problem isn't including gay kids, it's the subversion of everything we do by the gay ideology. For just taking gay kids camping and sharing the fun with them isn't good enough. Before long, we'll have people insisting that BSA has to do some mandatory diversity training, wherein we drum into everyone's heads the goodness of gayness.

Be it noted, "the goodness of gayness" was NOT up for a vote, and if BSA thinks that's what we've approved, it's deluding itself. I'm willing to accept kids who identify themselves as gay -- I always have -- but I will not change the values we teach, which are the primary objective of the program. The debate isn't about people -- for all of whom Christ died; the debate is about the teaching, which is non-negotiable. And BSA needs to understand, explicitly, that if their values someday come to conflict with the values I was ordained to teach, then I will drop my membership in the program, too, as well as pull the plug on the charter-partner relationship my congregation has with BSA.

  • Point of view in LOTR

    One of the achievements of The Lord of the Rings is its complicated narrative architecture. Stories are interlaced and we follow, now this sub-plot,…

  • Arthur contra mundum

    The consensus opinion among Tolkien critics -- including those who greatly admire his work -- is that The Lord of the Rings is slow to get going,…

  • Not all ancient institutions are good

    The institutions of the Roman Republic have cast a long shadow over western government. Even our Founders paid close attention to the Roman model,…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.