aefenglommung (aefenglommung) wrote,

rough draft of an introduction to my English course

This course is not a survey of English literature from its beginnings. Nor is it a rationally laid-out overview of English grammar, or syntax, or vocabulary. It is mostly a course in Rhetoric, and each section includes assignments for preparation and presentation in written and oral form; that said, it is not your usual course in Rhetoric, whether considered as Speech or as Composition.

It is an attempt to show you what English is through how it has developed over the centuries. Once you know how English operates, you will be able to take advantage of both the mechanics and the aesthetics of the English language to speak and write more effectively. The texts provided are intended to be read as examples, not as "greats." The outline and bibliography that accompany the course will give you a list of works that a well-read student of English should have read. You may consider this a lifetime list, to be worked at as long as the joy of reading remains with you.

Is is the premise of this course that English must be understood as a Germanic language. It has become almost a universal language, and its changes over the centuries have rendered it in many ways sui generis; nevertheless, in its basic grammar and vocabulary, it is as much a product of the Germanic world of late antiquity as modern German, or Dutch, or Danish. C.S. Lewis even argued* that the kinds of stories and poems that appealed to ancient English people, including especially their unique outlook on life and their literary taste, are still characteristic of modern English-speaking people. The ever-widening encounters of English with other languages and literary forms has given English writers much more to write about, but in the end what they write best is written in a way that conforms to the patterns of the English language and the viewpoint of the English-speaking peoples.

With such an approach, it is to be expected that charges of antiquarianism will be raised in some quarters. Nay, it is certain that in these early years of the Twenty-first Century, charges of racism and sexism (and who-knows-what-ism) will be leveled against this course. Proto-Indo-European, Germanic, Old English, Middle English, early Modern English -- to speak of these things is to many scholars and ideologues to conjure up the deadest, whitest, most patriarchal, most Euro-centric of all dead, white, male Europeans. But to pretend that English has somehow escaped its origins and can be freed from its fetters to become the sanitized, non-oppressive, liberating channel of communication desired by the devotees of diversity is to ask for what has never existed, and never will. Even the politically correct agitators' arguments are best expressed when they ignore their ideology and use their language in conformity to their language's own nature. Which is simply to say, that the rules of Rhetoric are not devised, but discovered.

English is a natural, organic thing, which grows and develops according to its own nature. No one knows why the Great Vowel Shift happened. No one planned it. No one guided it. Every parent understood one's child, and every child one's parents, yet within an astonishingly short time around AD 1400, the inhabitants of thousands of places all pronounced their vowels differently from the way their grandparents did. No matter what argument one had to make, the argument was now made with vowels that sounded this way, not the way they used to sound. An ideologue who came along and insisted that vowels should be pronounced yet some other way, in the name of some vision of justice that he was possessed of, would produce only ineffective gibberish, unless he used the vowels that everyone else used. His argument that we changed before, so we could change again, would be laughable, except for the real harm done by scores of reformers who have asked the ridiculous or the impossible of their followers and used the police power of the State (or Church, or School) to punish those who could not wrap their tongues around the new shibboleths imposed in the name of his god.

*[insert citation]
Tags: english course

  • Will no one say a good word about committees?

    I may one of the few people who have something good to say about committees. Most people see committees as wastes of time and producers of…

  • We're on the upward trail, indeed

    It is more important to be a Christian than to be a Scout. Baden-Powell will not be pleading for me at the Last Judgment (though I believe he will be…

  • A preacherly sin

    Every now and then, I will click on a YouTube video that looks interesting, only to find that the presenter(s) can’t get started. There’s a lot of…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.