aefenglommung (aefenglommung) wrote,
aefenglommung
aefenglommung

Aboard the good ship UMC

The Church has often been compared to a ship. Even our church architecture reflects this, with the nave, or seating area of the sanctuary named after the Greek naos, Latin navis, meaning "ship." Aye, the Church is the barque of St. Peter, with the cross for its mast, driven by the wind of the Holy Ghost. A fine image.

Now, I have frequently used the term "mutiny" to describe what is going on in The United Methodist Church these days, as progressive radicals attempt to seize control of The UMC by their disobedience to the ordinary rules and procedures of The Discipline. But you can also describe what is going on in terms of the fabric of a sailing ship.

A ship of the Age of Sail had miles of rope used to both hold it together and manage it at sea. The ropes that raised, lowered, and trimmed the sails to catch the wind were called halyards, sheets, and other things. "Learning the ropes" was what sailors called their training in seamanship. You had to know which rope to lay hand to, and which way to pull it -- in teamwork with many others -- in order to handle the ship. This was the running rigging.

There was also, however, the standing rigging. These were the ropes that held the ship together; they were called stays and shrouds. They kept the masts firmly in place and balanced the tension both laterally and fore-and-aft. If they broke, whether because of too much tension or because of enemy fire or from wear and tear, the masts would immediately begin to wobble. Then, any pressure of the wind on the sails would pull the whole jumble of masts, spars, sails, and whatnot apart. Down it would all come, rendering the ship, at best, a drifting hulk, incapable of independent motion; at worst, the loss of the top hamper might damage the hull or even capsize the vessel.

The standing rigging of The UMC is the dogma, the institutions, and the ministry relationships described in The Book of Discipline. The running rigging of The UMC is our established procedures for conducting business and doing ministry. The whole, bewildering maze of rules, Orders, forms, meetings, officers, Conferences and so on is as difficult to master as learning the ropes on a sailing ship. Well I remember my early days in the pastorate, struggling to learn what I had to do. Forty years later, I still meet lifelong lay United Methodists who have no idea what many of those paragraphs in the BOD are for, or which one they should pull on to make the congregation go where they want it to.

The mutinous progs, by insisting that they will not follow the rules about ministerial relationships and conduct -- by electing and installing a lesbian bishop, by ordaining and appointing and routinely dismissing charges against or requiring "just resolutions" which amount to no consequences for "self-avowed, practicing homosexuals" in the ministry, by passing resolutions of non-compliance with the BOD, by performing prohibited same-sex marriages -- have effectively cut the shrouds and stays that hold the ship together. This makes the plaintive bleat of the "centrists," who keep saying that we need to quit worrying about what other people do, and instead concentrate on doing ministry -- that is, working the running rigging in order to catch "the wind that blows where it wills" -- not only fatuous but dangerous. Once the standing rigging is damaged, any attempt to make sail will simply pull the ship apart.

The progs and centrists complain that we evangelicals and orthodox have sex on the brain. I would retort that it is they, not we, who have made sexuality the principal issue to be argued about for the last forty years. But let that go. While the most obvious damage to The UMC is being done by those pushing for their vision of LGBTQ empowerment, the actual fraying of the standing rigging has been going on for a long time.

When was the last time your congregation had an honest Charge Conference presided over by a DS or traveling elder who actually called for business to be done in a business-like way? This is our primary means of connectional accountability for the local church, and it has been turned into a kind of mass rally of many congregations at once at which all the "boring paper work" is de-emphasized and all the "exciting" stuff the DS wants to talk about is promoted. We don't believe in Charge Conferences any more, so more and more responsibilities are being heaped upon Church Councils, which now must operate as if we had a congregational form of government. And then the Powers That Be wonder why local UM churches want to operate in ways that the BOD forbids.

For that matter, when was the last time your Annual Conference session actually received and acted on ordinary items of business? Ours has become a trade show, a convention. It is not desired that the members of the Conference, both clergy and lay, actually vote on anything. Voting is divisive. Far better to let the Conference staff do everything and just take a voice vote once to authorize everything. Then we can spend more time on speeches and seminars conducted by The Usual Suspects invited by the bishop. Then, because everyone understands that their time is being wasted, we have to keep offering more spectacle and family entertainment foofaraw to get people to attend.

The AC lost interest in maintaining boards and committees long ago, so they don't really have much volunteer structure any more, either. The staff can do all that, too. We don't really need or want anybody's input. And there are no budgets for individual committees, either. So only the stuff the people in the inner ring want gets done. And all those offices The Discipline requires? Well, we'll elect people to them, but put them all on one "Table," where they can fight for the few resources we make available for them to do all those things The Discipline contemplates getting done.

Meanwhile, the General Boards and Agencies don't believe in our UM structure any more, either. They can't get Conferences and Districts to respond to them, so they don't do training for Conf and Dist chairs of this or that any more. Each agency recruits its own local agents and credentials them to go make something happen wherever they are. They point to all these people they're supposedly doing ministry with and through, but these local Ministry Specialists of various sorts are mostly anonymous or ignored.

All across The UMC, everyone says, "we need to approach this in a Wesleyan way," but the essential structures and institutions John Wesley created, including the Conference and connectionalism itself, have been ignored to the point of decay. Nobody believes in The UM way to do things any more in The UMC. Our bishop can't even use the correct title for District Superintendents; everybody is just making it up however they want.

The standing rigging of the ship is in shreds and tatters. Until it be repaired, we dare not attempt to sail it any faster, lest it simply come apart and we founder utterly.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment